Rudi Giuliani apparently thinks our next president ought to conduct America’s foreign policy in the same manner he navigated the end of his last marriage…an in your face flaunting of one’s ability to do what one chooses regardless of how it might be perceived and who might get hurt in the process. Perhaps I’m being too harsh…after all…he does have more experience than most.
Never let it be said that Teddy Roosevelt had anything on Rudi Giuliani. The esteemed former mayor turned modern day Rambo apparently believes one should not only carry a big stick…but one ought to loudly and clearly shout out who is scheduled to receive the next clubbing. Perhaps he and Dick Cheney could enjoy spending vacation time together clubbing baby seals?
In the course of a week, Giuliani has offered perhaps the most ill-conceived view on foreign policy since…oh, let’s see…George Bush?! Better still, Giuliani, in his apparent wisdom, has decided to one-up George Bush by arguing that efforts to establish a Palestinian state may have been far too hasty and it may be time to reconsider the need for more preconditions.
From The New York Sun:
“Too much emphasis has been placed on brokering negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians — negotiations that bring up the same issues again and again,” Mayor Giuliani writes in an essay published yesterday in Foreign Affairs. “It is not in the interest of the United States, at a time when it is being threatened by Islamist terrorists, to assist the creation of another state that will support terrorism.”
In some of the boldest language on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict used thus far by any presidential candidate, Mr. Giuliani writes: “Palestinian statehood will have to be earned through sustained good governance, a clear commitment to fighting terrorism, and a willingness to live in peace with Israel.”
That language appears to be a direct shot at President Bush and Secretary of State Rice, who are making just such a push for final status negotiations between President Abbas and Prime Minister Olmert in September, despite Hamas’s takeover of Gaza in June.
Mr. Giuliani’s senior foreign policy adviser, Charles Hill, said yesterday that the Bush administration’s current push to forge a peace deal between the Palestinian Authority president and the Israeli prime minister may be “risking too much.”
Mr. Hill went further yesterday, saying he does not expect that Mr. Giuliani, if he becomes president, would support Iraqi national elections, scheduled for 2009, if it appeared that they would empower Islamist terrorist parties and others with their own private armies. “We would have to look at the situation at that time,” he said.
Prior to the 2000 presidential election, George Bush told voters that he was opposed to nation building. Over six years later, the President not only favors nation building; he considers it his divinely inspired mission to deliver freedom and democracy to the oppressed peoples of the world.
Reading between the lines of the Giuliani manifesto, this process would be continued, though he seemingly favors a slower implementation of open elections. As I read the Giuliani approach, he would only implement a fully democratic government when he was convinced the decisions of the voting public would meet with his favor. After all, why shouldn’t the exporter of democracy have the prerogative to dictate the type of freedom he wants to install?
Apparently Mr. Giuliani believes such benevolent meddling will be met with thankful acceptance from the recipients. If not, I presume the new and improved “decider” might conclude it’s time to pull out a larger Louisville Slugger and pummel the misguided until such time as they realize what’s good for them.
Good for Giuliani…at least he doesn’t seem apt to make the Cheney mistake of promising us a rose petal parade. His approach seems to be much more measured…I think he’ll be happy with a few strategically placed statues expressing a sufficient level of homage to the liberator.
No doubt Rudi must fashion himself as the law and order candidate. If I didn’t know better, I might conclude that Mr. Giuliani is determined to prove that wearing a skirt should never be seen as a sign of weakness. While that may seem inconsequential, keep in mind that Hillary, his potential opponent, does wear pants.
Given this bold effort to portray a tough guy image, maybe the campaign should adopt a new slogan, “Look out world, there’s a new sheriff in town”. On second thought, that could prove risky…he did spend a lot of time in the Village…people.
Cross-posted at Thought Theater
